- Published on
Delegation and Accountability
- Authors
- Name
- Jason Ehmke
- @jason_ehmke
Delegating tasks within a team carries an echo. It's an echo that resonates throughout the team, shaping its rhythm, its ethos, and its execution. This echo speaks volumes.
When you delegate, you're creating an unspoken agreement with your team. It's like you're extending your hand, saying, "I trust you with this." But what happens when this gesture is misunderstood? When delegation is thought as shirking responsibility or sidestepping accountability?
When you delegate without clarity or intent, it gives a message to your team. It suggests, "I'm stepping away." This murmur, if left unchecked, can grow louder, influencing the team's very understanding of accountability. They might begin to see delegation as an escape route rather than an empowerment strategy.
The implications of this misinterpretation can be far-reaching. A team that sees delegation as detachment might lack the drive to take ownership, the motivation to adhere to timelines, or the passion to excel. They might miss targets, falter in quality, and in the blame game that might ensue, the harmony of the team can be disrupted. This isn't merely detrimental to the project at hand — it takes a toll on every team member. It can lead to disenchantment, disengagement, and even a sense of disillusionment, blocking the team's path to greatness.
Let’s take a look at the leadership style of Eleanor Roosevelt, the former First Lady of the United States. A strong advocate for human rights, she was known to delegate crucial tasks to her team. But here's the catch — she did so with utmost faith, providing guidance but also granting autonomy. She entrusted them with significant responsibilities, but she never distanced herself from accountability. Even in delegation, her involvement was palpable, her commitment unwavering. The outcome? A team that felt empowered yet aligned, leading to monumental strides in civil rights and humanitarian causes.
Delegation, as championed by leaders like Roosevelt, is not just about allocating tasks. It's a statement, one that affirms trust, encourages initiative, and bolsters responsibility. When you delegate with purpose, you reaffirm your commitment to the team, illustrating that delegation and accountability are two sides of the same coin.
So, bear in mind, every act of delegation, every task you entrust, has the potential to shape the core of your team. If you seek a team where accountability thrives alongside autonomy, the key lies in purposeful delegation. By embracing this, you're paving the way for a team that's not only efficient and effective but also enthusiastic and engaged — a team that, despite hurdles, persists, evolves, and achieves together.